| =SA= Vs. rA| | |
|
|
Author | Message |
---|
ThePrinter M.I.A.
Messages : 1751 Age : 29
| Subject: =SA= Vs. rA| Sun 30 Jun - 8:31 | |
| Their pick: Our pick: Tie: The thing is: Sometimes I play better then other times. Dunno why. Shine was terrible actually. It also was because Shine needs good teamwork and BlackOps and I had problems with that. But this was our first CM so we need to work on TW | |
|
| |
Furios =SA= Friend
Messages : 398 Age : 26
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Sun 30 Jun - 8:36 | |
| crazy shit, gay client xD D3 is actually "their" map so gg | |
|
| |
BlackOps Visitor
Messages : 87 Age : 25
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Sun 30 Jun - 20:30 | |
| On ingress , They scored two flags at the last minute We almost won :/ but "GG" ThePrinter | |
|
| |
Sveark Visitor
Messages : 2 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Mon 1 Jul - 9:08 | |
| How the ac_ingress game did look from my point of view: Hint: the messages in the chat that disclose our location. | |
|
| |
ThePrinter M.I.A.
Messages : 1751 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Mon 1 Jul - 9:22 | |
| what are you suggesting Sveark? That we were cheating? I certainly hope not lad... Choose wisely here. | |
|
| |
PhaNtom =SA= Friend
Messages : 417 Age : 27
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Mon 1 Jul - 10:18 | |
| If you are talking about the fnatic people...that's LeXuS and crew. | |
|
| |
ShadowFlameZ Visitor
Messages : 677 Age : 30
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Mon 1 Jul - 10:21 | |
| That's not the point PhaNtom.
Printer, I don't think he's going that far. But tbh, if there were spectators who were interrupting the game like this (not necessarily saying that they were intentionally helping you or not), you guys probably should have votekicked them and then restarted. | |
|
| |
ThePrinter M.I.A.
Messages : 1751 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Tue 2 Jul - 0:20 | |
| That would have been wise..
1. They could be trolling: we were not using the info 2. rA never said: be silent 3. rA never tried to kick them 4. rA won
Sooo I dont understand why this dude is coming to our forum accusing us of something... | |
|
| |
Furios =SA= Friend
Messages : 398 Age : 26
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Tue 2 Jul - 0:34 | |
| - ShadowFlameZ wrote:
tbh, if there were spectators who were interrupting the game like this (not necessarily saying that they were intentionally helping you or not), you guys probably should have votekicked them . +1 | |
|
| |
Sveark Visitor
Messages : 2 Age : 31
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Tue 2 Jul - 11:39 | |
| - ThePrinter wrote:
- That would have been wise..
1. They could be trolling: we were not using the info 2. rA never said: be silent 3. rA never tried to kick them 4. rA won
Sooo I dont understand why this dude is coming to our forum accusing us of something... I did not utter a word accusing someone, you are doing it yourselves. I came in order to announce the price at which we got that win, as it seems to be unusual and, therefore, interesting. | |
|
| |
ThePrinter M.I.A.
Messages : 1751 Age : 29
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| Wed 3 Jul - 19:55 | |
| Aight in that case I understand it wrong, sorry & Congrats! | |
|
| |
Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: =SA= Vs. rA| | |
| |
|
| |
| =SA= Vs. rA| | |
|